In my article of the Basic Income Emancipation of January 3 this year, concluded the article giving my opinion on this type of aid. I reaffirm that they are mere patches seeking cover the underlying problems and also would bring consequences such as rent gouging.
me also reaffirm that the target of such aid, as it was defined, would cause people in real need of rent would remain without such assistance, either because they reached the age regulations to qualify for it, either because the landlord had the option of renting to another person who is eligible for assistance. In this article I thought that this aid was going to end up being for home and not for the tenant and I will try to explain why.
As a market, in this case of rental housing, where demand for rental apartments far exceeds the supply, all help to apply the demand side, supply necessarily benefit because the offer is inelastic.
What is that about the inelasticity of supply?. Means that although the demand is robust to a particular good or service, the offer does not fit in the short term demand, but remains more or less constant over time. The rental housing market in Spain is a book. Always there are more people willing to live rent apartments people willing to bid in exchange for rent.
What is the consequence of the above?. The homeowners asked the applicants or through intermediaries acting in the market that have the support or at least qualify for it, since they may increase the rent in proportion to the assistance obtained. That is, the applicant comes out as expensive as ever, the landlord gets an extra monthly income and the state pays the difference.
In conclusion, it is using public money to fix the problem NO rent, do not affect the people who really need it, DO NOT help people benefiting from the aid and SI for landlords to benefit from more convenient and cost effective. Can
find other solutions to the particular problem of rent and general housing in Spain?. Yes Except death and taxes, any remedy.
For example, an in-depth reform legislation that addresses adequately the reality faced by a landlord against a defaulting tenant. The ability to request credit reports to banks on the situation of a potential tenant or the provision of guarantee to a public authority.
Made the state to intervene directly instead of creating an appropriate framework, we have the creation of public housing stock which pays a usufruct rent as a perpetual and transferable on public property. The possibility that the VPO are hired and a decade ago has option to buy it ..... There are hundreds of ways far more effective than aid the sleeve removed, especially before elections, and without thinking.
And if there is enough imagination, we will always look to countries like the Netherlands, Norway or Sweden and see their social policies. Above all, be aware of how they act on the root of the problems and not side effects.
Ay, as Groucho said great!: Politics is the art of looking for trouble, find them, make a false diagnosis and then applying the wrong remedies.
me also reaffirm that the target of such aid, as it was defined, would cause people in real need of rent would remain without such assistance, either because they reached the age regulations to qualify for it, either because the landlord had the option of renting to another person who is eligible for assistance. In this article I thought that this aid was going to end up being for home and not for the tenant and I will try to explain why.
As a market, in this case of rental housing, where demand for rental apartments far exceeds the supply, all help to apply the demand side, supply necessarily benefit because the offer is inelastic.
What is that about the inelasticity of supply?. Means that although the demand is robust to a particular good or service, the offer does not fit in the short term demand, but remains more or less constant over time. The rental housing market in Spain is a book. Always there are more people willing to live rent apartments people willing to bid in exchange for rent.
What is the consequence of the above?. The homeowners asked the applicants or through intermediaries acting in the market that have the support or at least qualify for it, since they may increase the rent in proportion to the assistance obtained. That is, the applicant comes out as expensive as ever, the landlord gets an extra monthly income and the state pays the difference.
In conclusion, it is using public money to fix the problem NO rent, do not affect the people who really need it, DO NOT help people benefiting from the aid and SI for landlords to benefit from more convenient and cost effective. Can
find other solutions to the particular problem of rent and general housing in Spain?. Yes Except death and taxes, any remedy.
For example, an in-depth reform legislation that addresses adequately the reality faced by a landlord against a defaulting tenant. The ability to request credit reports to banks on the situation of a potential tenant or the provision of guarantee to a public authority.
Made the state to intervene directly instead of creating an appropriate framework, we have the creation of public housing stock which pays a usufruct rent as a perpetual and transferable on public property. The possibility that the VPO are hired and a decade ago has option to buy it ..... There are hundreds of ways far more effective than aid the sleeve removed, especially before elections, and without thinking.
And if there is enough imagination, we will always look to countries like the Netherlands, Norway or Sweden and see their social policies. Above all, be aware of how they act on the root of the problems and not side effects.
Ay, as Groucho said great!: Politics is the art of looking for trouble, find them, make a false diagnosis and then applying the wrong remedies.
Here you have a link so that you judge the situation.
Related articles: Basic income emancipation
0 comments:
Post a Comment